Since 2016, White Coat Waste Project’s BeagleGate campaign and other investigations and lawsuits have uncovered how the National Institutes of Health is the country’s single largest funder of cruel and wasteful experiments on pets.
We’ve exposed and stopped the NIH’s $770,000 treadmill experiments on cats in Russia, Dr. Fauci’s $1.8 million runny nose tests on puppies and, most recently, his misguided plan to revive discredited experiments on kittens.
But we’ve also documented how the agency continues to waste tens of millions of tax dollars each year to abuse and kill puppies and kittens in outdated and unnecessary testing in the U.S. and overseas. The NIH is also lagging behind other federal agencies that have reduced or fully eliminated dog and cat testing following WCW campaigns.
Now, referencing WCW’s exposés, Congress is demanding details from the NIH about its efforts to cut wasteful experimentation on pets.
The NIH’s 2025 spending bill advanced by the House Appropriations Committee includes language WCW lobbied for that requires NIH to draft and publicly publish a report outlining what it’s doing to reduce painful testing on dogs and cats, including NIH maximum pain tests where relief is intentionally withheld.
WCW worked with over a dozen Democrat and Republican lawmakers led by Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) to secure this transparency and accountability measure, including Jared Moskowitz (D-FL), Brian Mast (R-FL), Bill Posey (R-FL), Aaron Bean (R-FL), Troy Nehls (R-TX), Don Davis (D-NC), Dina Titus (D-NV), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Carlos Gimenez (R-FL), and Scott Perry (R-PA).
Our BeagleGate investigation exposing Dr. Fauci’s funding for biting fly tests on beagles in Tunisia made NIH’s pet experimentation a household topic, but that was just the tip of the iceberg.
Recent and ongoing NIH-funded experimentation on pets exposed by WCW include:
Is this how you want your money spent?